2005 Citroen C3 vs. 1967 Mini MK I
To start off, 2005 Citroen C3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C3 (72 HP @ 3300 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1967 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1967 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen C3 weights approximately 465 kg more than 1967 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C3 (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C3 | 1967 Mini MK I | |
Make | Citroen | Mini |
Model | C3 | MK I |
Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 3300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 60 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2040 mm |