2005 Citroen C3 vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2005 Citroen C3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C3 (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen C3 weights approximately 138 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 94 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C3 | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Citroen | Riley |
Model | C3 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1053 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2380 mm |