2005 Citroen C3 vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 2005 Citroen C3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2.5 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (150 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C3. (72 HP @ 3300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2.5 should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Triumph 2.5 weights approximately 53 kg more than 2005 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Triumph 2.5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Triumph 2.5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (222 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen C3. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1968 Triumph 2.5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Citroen C3 | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
| Make | Citroen | Triumph |
| Model | C3 | 2.5 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 222 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.1 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1133 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 64 L |
