2005 Citroen C3 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2005 Citroen C3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C3 (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen C3 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C3 (135 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C3 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Citroen | Zastava |
Model | C3 | 102 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2160 mm |