2005 Citroen C3 vs. 1982 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 2005 Citroen C3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,196 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Seat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Seat Ritmo (63 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C3. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen C3 weights approximately 173 kg more than 1982 Seat Ritmo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C3 (94 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C3 | 1982 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | Citroen | Seat |
Model | C3 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1053 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2460 mm |