2005 Citroen C3 vs. 1997 Rover 200
To start off, 2005 Citroen C3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Rover 200 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C3. (72 HP @ 3300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen C3 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1997 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Rover 200 (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen C3. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1997 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C3 | 1997 Rover 200 | |
Make | Citroen | Rover |
Model | C3 | 200 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 3300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75.1 mm | 75.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2510 mm |