2005 Citroen C3 vs. 1998 Lotus Elise
To start off, 2005 Citroen C3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Lotus Elise. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Lotus Elise would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lotus Elise is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Elise (116 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C3. (72 HP @ 3300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Elise should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen C3 weights approximately 375 kg more than 1998 Lotus Elise.
Because 1998 Lotus Elise is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Lotus Elise. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus Elise (165 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen C3. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1998 Lotus Elise will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C3 | 1998 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Citroen | Lotus |
Model | C3 | Elise |
Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 3300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 89.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.3 L/100km | 13.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 40 L |