2005 Citroen C3 vs. 2006 Isuzu I-350
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C3. (72 HP @ 3300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C3.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Citroen C3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen C3. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C3 | 2006 Isuzu I-350 | |
Make | Citroen | Isuzu |
Model | C3 | I-350 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 3458 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 3300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.3 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 74 L |