2005 Citroen C3 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (211 HP) has 139 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C3. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C3.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen C3. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Citroen C3 | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
| Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
| Model | C3 | Raider |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 3704 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 211 HP |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 5590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 83 L |
