2005 Citroen C3 vs. 2012 Volvo C30

To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo C30 (101 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C3. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 240 kg more than 2005 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Citroen C3 has automatic transmission and 2012 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2012 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Citroen C3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Citroen C3 2012 Volvo C30
Make Citroen Volvo
Model C3 C30
Year Released 2005 2012
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1359 cc 1600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 89 HP 101 HP
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1211 kg 1451 kg
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4252 mm
Vehicle Width 1670 mm 1783 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 1448 mm
Wheelbase Size 2320 mm 2639 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 47 L 60 L