2005 Citroen C4 vs. 1986 Volvo 242

To start off, 2005 Citroen C4 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Volvo 242. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Volvo 242 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen C4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C4 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1986 Volvo 242. (97 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C4 should accelerate faster than 1986 Volvo 242. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Volvo 242 weights approximately 11 kg more than 2005 Citroen C4.

Because 1986 Volvo 242 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Volvo 242. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Volvo 242 (157 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen C4. (110 Nm). This means 1986 Volvo 242 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen C4. 2005 Citroen C4 has automatic transmission and 1986 Volvo 242 has manual transmission. 1986 Volvo 242 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Citroen C4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: