2005 Citroen C4 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Citroen C4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Citroen C4 would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C4. (89 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C4.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen C4. (134 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen C4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Citroen C4 | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
| Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
| Model | C4 | Raider |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 3704 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 83 L |
