2005 Citroen C5 vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 2005 Citroen C5 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C5 (135 HP) has 84 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen C5 weights approximately 405 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C5 (205 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C5 | 1950 Holden FX | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | C5 | FX |
Year Released | 2005 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2165 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 205 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 970 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2620 mm |