2005 Citroen C5 vs. 1964 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2005 Citroen C5 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,997 cc, 2005 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C5 (135 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen C5 weights approximately 391 kg more than 1964 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C5 (205 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C5 | 1964 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Citroen | Zastava |
Model | C5 | 1500 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1295 cc |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 205 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 984 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2430 mm |