2005 Citroen C5 vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Citroen C5 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,343 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass (120 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C5. (117 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C5.
Because 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass (305 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen C5. (160 Nm). This means 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Citroen C5 | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Citroen | Oldsmobile |
| Model | C5 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1749 cc | 4343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 117 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2750 mm |
