2005 Citroen C5 vs. 1980 Zastava 2101
To start off, 2005 Citroen C5 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,749 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C5 (117 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 2101.
Because 1980 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C5 (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Citroen C5 | 1980 Zastava 2101 | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | C5 | 2101 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 1749 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 117 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2430 mm |
