2005 Citroen C5 vs. 2000 Mercury Tracer
To start off, 2005 Citroen C5 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 1,997 cc, 2005 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C5 (135 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2000 Mercury Tracer. (109 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercury Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen C5 weights approximately 235 kg more than 2000 Mercury Tracer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C5 (205 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercury Tracer. (173 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercury Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C5 | 2000 Mercury Tracer | |
Make | Citroen | Mercury |
Model | C5 | Tracer |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1988 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 205 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1140 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2510 mm |