2005 Citroen C5 vs. 2009 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Citroen C5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Citroen C5 would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 294 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C5. (131 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 635 kg more than 2005 Citroen C5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 380 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen C5. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C5 | 2009 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | C5 | Charger |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 6059 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 425 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 570 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1960 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 72 L |