2005 Citroen C6 vs. 1962 Skoda 1202
To start off, 2005 Citroen C6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 2,721 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Citroen C6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C6 (205 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1962 Skoda 1202. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C6 should accelerate faster than 1962 Skoda 1202.
Because 1962 Skoda 1202 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Skoda 1202. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C6 (440 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Skoda 1202. (87 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C6 | 1962 Skoda 1202 | |
Make | Citroen | Skoda |
Model | C6 | 1202 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2721 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2690 mm |