2005 Citroen C6 vs. 1963 DKW F 11
To start off, 2005 Citroen C6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Citroen C6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C6 (212 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C6 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C6 (285 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW F 11. (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Citroen C6 | 1963 DKW F 11 | |
| Make | Citroen | DKW |
| Model | C6 | F 11 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2946 cc | 794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 71 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2260 mm |
