2005 Citroen C6 vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 2005 Citroen C6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Citroen C6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C6 (212 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000.
Because 1963 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C6 (285 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000. 2005 Citroen C6 has automatic transmission and 1963 Rover 2000 has manual transmission. 1963 Rover 2000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Citroen C6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C6 | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Citroen | Rover |
Model | C6 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2630 mm |