2005 Citroen C6 vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2005 Citroen C6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Citroen C6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C6 (212 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C6 should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K.
Because 1969 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Citroen C6 | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | C6 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 2946 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2010 mm |
