2005 Citroen C6 vs. 1971 Volvo 145
To start off, 2005 Citroen C6 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 2,721 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Citroen C6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C6 (205 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1971 Volvo 145. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C6 should accelerate faster than 1971 Volvo 145.
Because 1971 Volvo 145 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Volvo 145. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C6 (440 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Volvo 145. (152 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Volvo 145.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C6 | 1971 Volvo 145 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C6 | 145 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2721 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2620 mm |