2005 Citroen C6 vs. 1974 Rover 3.5
To start off, 2005 Citroen C6 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Rover 3.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Rover 3.5 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Rover 3.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C6 (205 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1974 Rover 3.5. (149 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C6 should accelerate faster than 1974 Rover 3.5.
Because 1974 Rover 3.5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Rover 3.5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C6 (440 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Rover 3.5. (276 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Rover 3.5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Citroen C6 | 1974 Rover 3.5 | |
| Make | Citroen | Rover |
| Model | C6 | 3.5 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2721 cc | 3532 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 276 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2820 mm |
