2005 Citroen C6 vs. 2003 Mazda 3
To start off, 2005 Citroen C6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Citroen C6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C6 (212 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 3. (160 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C6 (285 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 3. (195 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C6 | 2003 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C6 | 3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2850 mm |