2005 Citroen C6 vs. 2010 Lincoln MKZ
To start off, 2010 Lincoln MKZ is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Citroen C6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Citroen C6 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Lincoln MKZ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lincoln MKZ (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C6. (205 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lincoln MKZ should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C6 (440 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Lincoln MKZ. (337 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Lincoln MKZ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Citroen C6 | 2010 Lincoln MKZ | |
| Make | Citroen | Lincoln |
| Model | C6 | MKZ |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2721 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 263 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 337 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4821 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1834 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1445 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2728 mm |
