2005 Citroen C8 vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 2005 Citroen C8 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Citroen C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C8 (201 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C8 should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen C8 weights approximately 827 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C8 (285 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C8 | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C8 | 220 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 1776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1842 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 45 L |