2005 Citroen C8 vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2005 Citroen C8 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C8. (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen C8 weights approximately 121 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C8, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen C8. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen C8.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C8 | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | C8 | Challenger |
Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 6286 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 422 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1687 kg | 1566 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 75 L |