2005 Citroen Picasso vs. 1980 Zastava 1500

To start off, 2005 Citroen Picasso is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen Picasso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen Picasso (94 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Picasso should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen Picasso weights approximately 275 kg more than 1980 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1980 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Picasso, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen Picasso (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen Picasso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 1500.

Compare all specifications: