2005 Citroen Picasso vs. 1982 Lada 1200
To start off, 2005 Citroen Picasso is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen Picasso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen Picasso (87 HP @ 1900 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1982 Lada 1200. (61 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Picasso should accelerate faster than 1982 Lada 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen Picasso weights approximately 430 kg more than 1982 Lada 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Lada 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lada 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Picasso, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen Picasso (205 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lada 1200. (85 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen Picasso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lada 1200.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen Picasso | 1982 Lada 1200 | |
Make | Citroen | Lada |
Model | Picasso | 1200 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 61 HP |
Engine RPM | 1900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 205 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.5 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 39 L |