2005 Citroen Picasso vs. 2008 Lexus RX
To start off, 2008 Lexus RX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Citroen Picasso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Citroen Picasso would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Lexus RX (270 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 2005 Citroen Picasso. (94 HP @ 3000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen Picasso. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Lexus RX weights approximately 595 kg more than 2005 Citroen Picasso. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Lexus RX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Citroen Picasso. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Lexus RX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Lexus RX (340 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen Picasso. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen Picasso. 2008 Lexus RX has automatic transmission and 2005 Citroen Picasso has manual transmission. 2005 Citroen Picasso will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Lexus RX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen Picasso | 2008 Lexus RX | |
Make | Citroen | Lexus |
Model | Picasso | RX |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 94.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.8:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 15 seconds | 7.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 73 L |