2005 Citroen Picasso vs. 2008 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2008 SsangYong Musso is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Citroen Picasso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Citroen Picasso would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 SsangYong Musso (217 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2005 Citroen Picasso. (94 HP @ 3000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen Picasso. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 591 kg more than 2005 Citroen Picasso. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Citroen Picasso. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 SsangYong Musso (307 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen Picasso. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen Picasso. 2008 SsangYong Musso has automatic transmission and 2005 Citroen Picasso has manual transmission. 2005 Citroen Picasso will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 SsangYong Musso will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen Picasso | 2008 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Citroen | SsangYong |
Model | Picasso | Musso |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 307 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 171 km/hour | 176 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 15 seconds | 9.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1906 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 16.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 73 L |