2005 Citroen Saxo vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 2005 Citroen Saxo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,108 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen Saxo (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Saxo should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Volvo 66 weights approximately 15 kg more than 2005 Citroen Saxo.
Because 1979 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Saxo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen Saxo | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Saxo | 66 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1390 mm |