2005 Citroen Saxo vs. 1980 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2005 Citroen Saxo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,342 cc (12 cylinders), 1980 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 95 kg more than 2005 Citroen Saxo.
Because 1980 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Saxo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Citroen Saxo | 1980 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
| Model | Saxo | XJR |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 954 cc | 5342 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 90 L |
