2005 Citroen Xsara vs. 1941 Volvo PV
To start off, 2005 Citroen Xsara is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Volvo PV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Volvo PV would be higher. At 3,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1941 Volvo PV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen Xsara (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1941 Volvo PV. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1941 Volvo PV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Volvo PV weights approximately 274 kg more than 2005 Citroen Xsara.
Because 1941 Volvo PV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Volvo PV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Citroen Xsara has automatic transmission and 1941 Volvo PV has manual transmission. 1941 Volvo PV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Citroen Xsara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen Xsara | 1941 Volvo PV | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Xsara | PV |
Year Released | 2005 | 1941 |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 3668 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1216 kg | 1490 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2880 mm |