2005 Citroen Xsara vs. 1952 Fiat Campagnola
To start off, 2005 Citroen Xsara is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen Xsara (161 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Fiat Campagnola weights approximately 11 kg more than 2005 Citroen Xsara.
Because 1952 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Citroen Xsara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen Xsara | 1952 Fiat Campagnola | |
Make | Citroen | Fiat |
Model | Xsara | Campagnola |
Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1239 kg | 1250 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2260 mm |