2005 Citroen Xsara vs. 1952 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2005 Citroen Xsara is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen Xsara (161 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1952 Maserati A6G. (158 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1952 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 689 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen Xsara | 1952 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Citroen | Maserati |
Model | Xsara | A6G |
Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1239 kg | 550 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2290 mm |