2005 Citroen Xsara vs. 1961 Lancia Appia
To start off, 2005 Citroen Xsara is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Lancia Appia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Lancia Appia would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen Xsara (134 HP) has 79 more horse power than 1961 Lancia Appia. (55 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1961 Lancia Appia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 443 kg more than 1961 Lancia Appia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Lancia Appia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Lancia Appia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen Xsara (183 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Lancia Appia. (87 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Lancia Appia. 2005 Citroen Xsara has automatic transmission and 1961 Lancia Appia has manual transmission. 1961 Lancia Appia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Citroen Xsara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen Xsara | 1961 Lancia Appia | |
Make | Citroen | Lancia |
Model | Xsara | Appia |
Year Released | 2005 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1090 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 55 HP |
Torque | 183 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1248 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.7 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 42 L |