2005 Citroen Xsara vs. 1961 Volvo 220
To start off, 2005 Citroen Xsara is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 74 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 65 kg more than 1961 Volvo 220.
Let's talk about torque, 1961 Volvo 220 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen Xsara. (110 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1961 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Citroen Xsara | 1961 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | Xsara | 220 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |
