2005 Citroen Xsara vs. 1963 Mini MK I
To start off, 2005 Citroen Xsara is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen Xsara (161 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1963 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1963 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 624 kg more than 1963 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen Xsara (200 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen Xsara | 1963 Mini MK I | |
Make | Citroen | Mini |
Model | Xsara | MK I |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 60 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1239 kg | 615 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2040 mm |