2005 Citroen Xsara vs. 1964 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 2005 Citroen Xsara is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen Xsara (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 688 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen Xsara | 1964 Citroen 2CV | |
Make | Citroen | Citroen |
Model | Xsara | 2CV |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1248 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.7 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 63 L |