2005 Citroen Xsara vs. 1966 Renault 4
To start off, 2005 Citroen Xsara is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen Xsara (108 HP) has 75 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 568 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Citroen Xsara | 1966 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Citroen | Renault |
| Model | Xsara | 4 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 33 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1218 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |
