2005 Citroen Xsara vs. 1968 Mazda R-100

To start off, 2005 Citroen Xsara is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen Xsara (134 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1968 Mazda R-100. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda R-100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 443 kg more than 1968 Mazda R-100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Mazda R-100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda R-100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen Xsara (183 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda R-100. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda R-100. 2005 Citroen Xsara has automatic transmission and 1968 Mazda R-100 has manual transmission. 1968 Mazda R-100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Citroen Xsara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Citroen Xsara 1968 Mazda R-100
Make Citroen Mazda
Model Xsara R-100
Year Released 2005 1968
Body Type Hatchback Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 1963 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 134 HP 110 HP
Torque 183 Nm 135 Nm
Torque RPM 4100 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.8:1 9.4:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1248 kg 805 kg
Vehicle Length 4190 mm 3840 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1490 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2270 mm