2005 Citroen Xsara vs. 1969 Renault 4
To start off, 2005 Citroen Xsara is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen Xsara (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1969 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1969 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 751 kg more than 1969 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen Xsara | 1969 Renault 4 | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | Xsara | 4 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 745 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1401 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |