2005 Citroen Xsara vs. 1989 Citroen CX
To start off, 2005 Citroen Xsara is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen Xsara (161 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1989 Citroen CX. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 14 kg more than 1989 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen Xsara (200 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen CX. (159 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Citroen Xsara | 1989 Citroen CX | |
| Make | Citroen | Citroen |
| Model | Xsara | CX |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 200 Nm | 159 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1239 kg | 1225 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 80 L |
