2005 Citroen Xsara vs. 1996 Isuzu Amigo
To start off, 2005 Citroen Xsara is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Isuzu Amigo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Isuzu Amigo would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Isuzu Amigo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Isuzu Amigo (131 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2005 Citroen Xsara. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen Xsara.
Because 1996 Isuzu Amigo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Citroen Xsara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Isuzu Amigo (195 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen Xsara. (110 Nm). This means 1996 Isuzu Amigo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Citroen Xsara | 1996 Isuzu Amigo | |
| Make | Citroen | Isuzu |
| Model | Xsara | Amigo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1559 cc | 2198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 131 HP |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 195 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2340 mm |
