2005 Citroen Xsara vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2005 Citroen Xsara is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen Xsara (134 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 657 kg more than 2005 Citroen Xsara.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Citroen Xsara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (240 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen Xsara. (183 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Citroen Xsara | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
| Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Xsara | SSU |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 119 HP |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1248 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 71 L |
