2005 Citroen Xsara vs. 2008 Isuzu I-290
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-290 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Isuzu I-290 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Isuzu I-290 (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2005 Citroen Xsara. (161 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-290 should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen Xsara.
Because 2008 Isuzu I-290 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Isuzu I-290. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Isuzu I-290 (258 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen Xsara. (200 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2008 Isuzu I-290 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen Xsara | 2008 Isuzu I-290 | |
Make | Citroen | Isuzu |
Model | Xsara | I-290 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 258 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 74 L |