2005 Daewoo Evanda vs. 1962 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2005 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Daewoo Evanda (129 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Evanda should accelerate faster than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 567 kg more than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Volkswagen 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Volkswagen 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Daewoo Evanda | 1962 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Daewoo | Volkswagen |
Model | Evanda | 1500 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2430 mm |