2005 Daewoo Lanos vs. 1996 Mini MK VI
To start off, 2005 Daewoo Lanos is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 1,349 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Daewoo Lanos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Daewoo Lanos (75 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Lanos should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Daewoo Lanos weights approximately 457 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Daewoo Lanos (115 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2005 Daewoo Lanos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Daewoo Lanos | 1996 Mini MK VI | |
Make | Daewoo | Mini |
Model | Lanos | MK VI |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1349 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 69 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1077 kg | 620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2040 mm |